AOT Resource Library
One of the aims of this toolkit is to provide educational materials to all professionals within the AOT system of care, courts, mental health providers, hospital staff, individuals and law enforcement. Use the filters below to find AOT related resources geared towards specific audiences in various types of media.
-
February 2025System of care roles and responsibilitiesThis resource is meant to provide a general overview of the roles, restrictions, and information-sharing activities for positions that are a part of the AOT System of Care. These lists are nonexhaustive, and some roles are not represented.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsFamilies and advocatesLaw enforcementResource -
February 2025Establishing clear and convincing evidence for AOTThis resource depicts that the burden of proof in Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) cases lies with the petitioner, who must provide "clear and convincing" evidence that the individual meets specific criteria for AOT. This includes demonstrating the person’s mental illness impairs their ability to care for themselves or poses a risk to themselves or others, and that they lack insight into their need for treatment. Testimony from psychiatrists, who act as expert witnesses, is central to these proceedings, with case managers and treatment team members providing supportive information. Clear, detailed case notes are essential for psychiatrists to effectively present evidence in court.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsFamilies and advocatesBrief
-
January 2025Treatment team's AOT status report to PsychiatristThe purpose of this fillable PDF tool is for an AOT individual's treatment team to give all necessary information to the treating psychiatrist when requesting required authorization. This could be used when needing certification for an initial AOT assessment, deferral, extension, discharge, or a six month review.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsResource
-
January 2025How to terminate an AOT orderThis brief outlines the step-by-step process for terminating an Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) order, highlighting the importance of documentation, coordination with the probate court, and active involvement of mental health professionals. It is a practical guide for legal and mental health professionals to navigate the termination process while ensuring compliance with county-specific protocols.CourtsMental health providersIndividualsBrief
-
January 2025Judicial Admissions InformationThis document provides an overview of the Judicial Admission (J.A.) process for individuals with intellectual disabilities who require mandated mental health treatment. It details the criteria for admission, the steps for petitioning, and the necessary assessments by medical professionals. Additionally, it explains the differences between Judicial Admissions and Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) orders, outlining the specific procedures, requirements, and timelines for both. The document serves as a guide for legal and healthcare professionals involved in facilitating J.A. petitions and ensuring compliance with court orders.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsResource
-
January 2025Guidelines for Proof of Service in Probate Court PetitionsThis document outlines the process and legal requirements for serving interested parties after a petition is submitted to probate court. It details the Michigan Court Rules that govern how service should be carried out, including methods such as personal service, mailing, and electronic service, along with the timelines for each. Additionally, it explains the need for proof of service, which must be filed with the court after individuals are served, and addresses scenarios in which alternative methods of service may be requested. The document also highlights specific rules for ensuring the defendant is properly notified and the hearing can proceed without dismissal for improper service.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsResource
-
December 2024Treatment courts vs. AOT processThe document "Treatment Courts vs. AOT Process" explains the key differences between treatment courts and the Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) process in Michigan, highlighting their distinct functions and eligibility criteria. While treatment courts focus on rehabilitation for individuals involved in the criminal justice system, AOT operates within probate courts to mandate involuntary mental health treatment for individuals who cannot recognize their need for care. It emphasizes that AOT provides a legal mechanism for treatment without criminal consequences, whereas treatment courts offer alternatives to incarceration for those convicted of crimes, with legal sanctions for non-compliance.CourtsMental health providersHospitalsIndividualsFamilies and advocatesLaw enforcementBrief
-
October 2024How to start converations in your county about status conferencesThis document depicts the benefits and importance of holding status conferences in the probate court. An explanation of status conferences can be found, as well as strategies that providers can use in facilitating conversations with their court regarding implementing status conferences.CourtsMental health providersBrief
-
July 2024The value of status conferencesIn this Community of Practice, Jennifer Kimmel and Mel Brothers talk in depth about what a status conference is, how the process works in Genesee County, and what the benefits of conducting them are. In addition, they will touch on status conferences as an opportunity to celebrate a client’s success and adherence. These meetings are structured as the first half hour is presentation, and the last half hour being dialogue and a Q&A.CourtsMental health providersCommunity of Practice
-
June 2024AOT ParalegalsThe document describes the role of an Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) paralegal in the prosecutor’s office, which involves managing AOT petitions, coordinating with CMH and hospitals, and supporting prosecuting attorneys with pertinent case information. This position helps streamline the AOT process and ensures that mental health needs are recognized, potentially leading to quicker diversion strategies in criminal cases. The role may not require a full-time commitment and can be adapted based on the county's needs. An effective coordination between the prosecutor’s office and CMH is achieved through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which outlines responsibilities and agreements to facilitate successful collaboration.CourtsMental health providersBrief
